Is it just me, or does ANYbody else recognize the bodacious hypocrisy in the continued tolerance for the existence of Historically Black Colleges and Universities? Black higher education candidates decide out of preference to attended the socially engineered and contrived segregation, and these same Blacks likely toe the line behind which is lined complains of racial discrimination. Talk about chutzpah!!
In a supposed post-racial age and having survived the sunset of the Civil Rights Movement, can ANYbody cite an appropriate justification that does NOT pay homage to some undying presumption of Black Exceptionalism or one that can stand meritoriously against the outpouring of Liberal Limitlessness? Or, can ANYbody cite why this self-selected separatism – the HBCUs – is not the result of the self-admitted inability to coexist and compete in reality, versus the choice to matriculate in a setting that is too artificial and contrived to qualify as a vehicle for the truly enabled and mature-thinking college grads?
Oh, but wait!! Was it not 1964 when HBCUs were established? And, wasn’t that the same year that Republicans stood their ground and forced through the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts under the watchful victimization of the Johnson Administration? And, dare we forget that momentous Age of Desegregation? And, to the utmost surprise of many, and ashamedly so among Blacks, all monumental national achievements, all precipitants in Federal intervention during the 1960’s, all were championed by Republicans and morally courageous against virulent opposition staged by … you got it … the Democrats – self-avowed purported defenders of the weak and the saviors of those supposed to be beyond saving – the “great unwashed” – Black voters.
For decades, despite the moral hazards of mendacious allegations, half-truths, and historical revisionism, Democrats have managed to survive extinction and position themselves as the greater evolved amongst us, with the core tenet of that claim being their inimitable ability to exploit the useful idiocy of the poor, the “less fortunate,” and the socio-economic and politically oppressed. Democrats have religiously claimed empathy for society’s victims and have outright co-opted all Republican-engineered and sponsored social achievements and projected their own foibles and political transgressions onto the opposition party, knowing just how to frame the narrative with effective demagoguery. Of course, this is all made possible under the cloak of public ignorance, stupidity, and that all too infamous Republican circular firing squad.
Remarkably, none of this ever faces sufficient challenge, I suppose because society tends to ignore the innocuously insane. However, what the Democrats have managed to become through well-orchestrated demagoguery should never be discounted as being innocuous – insane … though undoubtedly functionally sociopathic.
And, as they have broad-brushed their partisan character to be the teeth of social justice and the flag bearers of the oppressed, they have sought and constructed ways and means of institutionalizing social oppression to the extent that true social change and advancement have themselves become depraved and rejected as political moral hazards. Considered to be enemies of the state, these relics of civility were to be avoided, inasmuch as they would bring balance and symmetry to social wellbeing, thus, to negate further need for struggle and the champions for cause. Therefore, social change and advancement can never take root where strife, struggle, and disparity have become the life blood of the Democrat and without which Liberals lack any relevance.
During the time when Education Desegregation was a very ugly head being reared, the Liberals of the 60’s sought a vehicle by which the Black struggle could be enshrined with sustainability, despite achievements along racial desegregation battle lines. So, triangulating the timeline trajectory, the Liberals foresaw a time when the racial twains would finally meet, axe handles returned to the woodpile, and Riot Police could bury their respective hatchets other than in each other’s head. Of course, this would spell the end of the Liberal’s role as grand arbiter of social injustice, racial bigotry, and all things prevailing against their Utopian ideals. THAT, they could not … WOULD not … allow.
So, in a move to create engrained perpetuity, the Liberal establishments waved their hands and created the still-standing shrine of Afro-centric bigotry, masquerading as Black Pride & Heritage – Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Though purported to be the token shroud of Black academic excellence, otherwise known as HBCUs, these ennobled pillars of segregation essentially institutionalize Black inadequacy and admitted inability to coexist amongst the other real-world inhabitants … and most importantly … the competitive arena of ideas in the form of public discourse.




















I'm interested in hearing more about your perspective. Do you know of any other who share your opinion?
My apologies for appearing to be delinquent in my response, but my earlier reply evidently did not submit.
Actually, my perspective only crystallizes those sentiments that are whispered among private conversations. Scratch the surface of any rationally objective person, and you will find bemusement as to why these institutions still exist.
A few years back, the graduating Valedictorian of Morehouse (a HBCU) was Joshua Packwood, a White student, and there was all sorts of complaints, alleging that a White student should not allowed to graduate as Val for a Historically Black College or University. So, then, should Historically WHITE Colleges and Universities allow enrollment of Black for fear of them eventually rising to graduate above Whites?
We have sailed to distant destinations; it's time to burn our ships. Going back is not the answer.